![]() Any act of "terrorism", however, is by definition prohibited and criminal. These prohibitions, which refer to acts the sole purpose of which is to intimidate civilians, are additional to the already mentioned rules aimed at protecting civilian life and property more generally.Ī crucial difference between IHL and the legal regime governing terrorism is that IHL is based on premise that certain acts of violence in war – against military objectives and personnel – are not prohibited. Moreover, IHL also specifically prohibits acts of terrorism against civilians in the hands of the adversary, as well as spreading terror among the civilian population by parties to an armed conflict in the conduct of hostilities. When a situation of violence amounts to an armed conflict, there is little added value in calling such acts "terrorism", because they already constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law. The use of human shields or hostage taking are similarly proscribed. ![]() IHL thus prohibits deliberate or direct, as well as indiscriminate attacks on civilians or civilian structures. A basic principle of IHL is that those engaged in an armed conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |